WELCOME!

"There are 70 pesticides that are listed as known or probable carcinogens, based on animal testing. Of those 70, 44 are in use today, and 23 are used on our food."

— Gina Solomon, specialist in internal medicine [2001]


Friday, February 4, 2011

A Food Manifesto for the Future By MARK BITTMAN

February 1, 2011, 10:28 PM

A Food Manifesto for the Future


For decades, Americans believed that we had the world’s healthiest and safest diet. We worried little about this diet’s effect on the environment or on the lives of the animals (or even the workers) it relies upon. Nor did we worry about its ability to endure — that is, its sustainability.
That didn’t mean all was well. And we’ve come to recognize that our diet is unhealthful and unsafe. Many food production workers labor in difficult, even deplorable, conditions, and animals are produced as if they were widgets. It would be hard to devise a more wasteful, damaging, unsustainable system.
Here are some ideas — frequently discussed, but sadly not yet implemented — that would make the growing, preparation and consumption of food healthier, saner, more productive, less damaging and more enduring. In no particular order:
  • End government subsidies to processed food. We grow more corn for livestock and cars than for humans, and it’s subsidized by more than $3 billion annually; most of it is processed beyond recognition. The story is similar for other crops, including soy: 98 percent of soybean meal becomes livestock feed, while most soybean oil is used in processed foods. Meanwhile, the marketers of the junk food made from these crops receive tax write-offs for the costs of promoting their wares. Total agricultural subsidies in 2009 were around $16 billion, which would pay for a great many of the ideas that follow.
  • Begin subsidies to those who produce and sell actual food for direct consumption. Small farmers and their employees need to make living wages. Markets — from super- to farmers’ — should be supported when they open in so-called food deserts and when they focus on real food rather than junk food. And, of course, we should immediately increase subsidies for school lunches so we can feed our youth more real food.
  • Break up the U.S. Department of Agriculture and empower theFood and Drug Administration. Currently, the U.S.D.A. counts among its missions both expanding markets for agricultural products (like corn and soy!) and providing nutrition education. These goals are at odds with each other; you can’t sell garbage while telling people not to eat it, and we need an agency devoted to encouraging sane eating. Meanwhile, the F.D.A. must be given expanded powers to ensure the safety of our food supply. (Food-related deaths are far more common than those resulting from terrorism, yet the F.D.A.’s budget is about one-fifteenth that of Homeland Security.)
  • Outlaw concentrated animal feeding operations and encourage the development of sustainable animal husbandry. The concentrated system degrades the environment, directly and indirectly, while torturing animals and producing tainted meat, poultry, eggs, and, more recently, fish. Sustainable methods of producing meat for consumption exist. At the same time, we must educate and encourage Americans to eat differently. It’s difficult to find a principled nutrition and health expert who doesn’t believe that a largely plant-based diet is the way to promote health and attack chronic diseases, which are now bigger killers, worldwide, than communicable ones. Furthermore, plant-based diets ease environmental stress, including global warming.
  • Encourage and subsidize home cooking. (Someday soon, I’ll write about my idea for a new Civilian Cooking Corps.) When people cook their own food, they make better choices. When families eat together, they’re more stable. We should provide food education for children (a new form of home ec, anyone?), cooking classes for anyone who wants them and even cooking assistance for those unable to cook for themselves.
  • Tax the marketing and sale of unhealthful foods. Another budget booster. This isn’t nanny-state paternalism but an accepted role of government: public health. If you support seat-belt, tobacco and alcohol laws, sewer systems and traffic lights, you should support legislation curbing the relentless marketing of soda and other foods that are hazardous to our health — including the sacred cheeseburger and fries.
  • Mandate truth in labeling. Nearly everything labeled “healthy” or “natural” is not. It’s probably too much to ask that “vitamin water” be called “sugar water with vitamins,” but that’s precisely what real truth in labeling would mean.Reduce waste and encourage recycling. The environmental stress incurred by unabsorbed fertilizer cannot be overestimated, and has caused, for example, a 6,000-square-mile dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico that is probably more damaging than the BP oil spill. And some estimates indicate that we waste half the food that’s grown. A careful look at ways to reduce waste and promote recycling is in order.
  • Reinvest in research geared toward leading a global movement in sustainable agriculture, combining technology and tradition to create a new and meaningful Green Revolution.
I’ll expand on these issues (and more) in the future, but the essential message is this: food and everything surrounding it is a crucial matter of personal and public health, of national and global security. At stake is not only the health of humans but that of the earth.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Could we have government that commits to a Windsor Essex Food Charter?

Food Security and Production:
Food is an integral part of the economy of Windsor and the surrounding area. A commitment to building bridges between urban and rural communities on food security will strengthen the food sector's self-reliance, growth and development. Local agriculture is important to producers and consumers alike. Urban and rural food security initiatives will preserve local agricultural production, and build on the mutual interdependence of producers and consumers. The Farmer's Market, Good Food Box programs, CSA Gardens serve as viable models of this interaction with local farmers and gardeners being able to market their products directly, and consumers being able to access nutritious, wholesome food. Urban agriculture can be advanced through the establishment of inner city community gardens that contribute directly to the economic, environment and social life of city residents. Food must be produced in a manner that is environmentally sustainable, safe for consumption and socially just.
Food Security and Justice:
Food is more than a commodity. It is a basic right. Every Windsor Essex resident should have access to an adequate supply of nutritious, affordable and safe food without social and economic barriers. In our urban and rural area, we must work with those communities most affected by lack of access to nutritious, affordable and safe food.
Food Security and Health:
Food security contributes to the physical, mental, spiritual and emotional well-being of residents. Nutrition education and consumption of wholesome, healthy foods are important factors in determining the overall positive health of the city's population, and this begins with the promotion of healthy eating practices - as early as birth - with breast feeding.
Food Security and Culture:
Food brings people together in the celebration of family and community, strengthening links between diverse cultures and urban and rural communities. The preparing, eating and sharing of food engages individuals and families in a social and community fellowship that balances physical and spiritual needs. Food is a social good that sustains and supports our communities and us.
Food Security and Globalization:
Any international agreements entered into by our governments must respect the full realization of people's right to adequate, nutritious, accessible, affordable, safe food at home and internationally. National, provincial and local governments must guarantee the right of communities and individuals to food security through supporting viable, sustainable, agricultural production and an equitable income distribution.
The fulfillment of a Local Windsor Essex Food Charter relies on citizens participating directly in and promoting food security measures in their homes, their work places, their community, and in this process strengthening citizen involvement and concern.
Therefore, to develop and promote food security in our city and county,  City and County Councils should:
  • Champion the right of all residents to adequate amounts of nutritious, safe, accessible, culturally acceptable food.
  • Advocate for income, employment, housing, and transportation policies that support secure and dignified access to food.
  • Ensure the safety of food and drinking water.
  • Ensure convenient access to an affordable range of nutritious foods in city facilities.
  • Adopt and promote food-purchasing practices that serve as a model of health, social and environmental responsibility and that support the local rural economy
  • Promote partnerships and programs that support rural-urban food links and the availability of locally grown, healthy foods through the Farmer's Markets, Good Food Box Programs and other rural-urban initiatives.
  • Protect local agricultural lands.
  • Encourage community gardens, urban agriculture and the recycling of organic materials that nurture soil fertility.
  • Support training and income generating programs that promote food security within a community economic development model.
  • Support nutrition education through promotion of skills-based programs for the community and in schools
  • Promote a yearly civic report card on how Windsor Essex is achieving food security.
  • Foster a civic culture that inspires support for healthy food for all.
These objectives will be achieved by working in partnership with community based organizations, community associations, Aboriginal peoples, resident groups, business organizations, trade unions, educational and health institutions and other levels of government.